Life Sciences News Hubb
Advertisement Banner
  • Home
  • what’s new in science
  • Life Science
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • what’s new in science
  • Life Science
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Gourmet News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home what's new in science

CRISPR Protects Bacteria From Invading Viruses in a Completely Unexpected Way : ScienceAlert

admin by admin
April 27, 2023
in what's new in science


The acronym CRISPR has become synonymous with editing DNA in recent years, taking center stage in the molecular geneticist’s toolbox as a means of identifying genetic codes and then cutting into them with uncanny precision.

In its original function as a means of immunity in bacteria, the CRISPR/Cas (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated endonuclease) system seeks out known genes of invading viruses and renders them dysfunctional.

Scientists from the University of Rochester and Cornell University, Ithaca, in the US and have discovered that the famous gene-editing tool does more in bacteria than just spot DNA for chopping up; it coordinates with other proteins to bulk up defenses against invading viruses as well.

Activating the funnel-shaped proteins – called Csx28 – scrambles the permeability of the bacteria’s membrane, making it difficult for invading viral DNA to hijack the cell’s machinery and replicate.

The finding, published in Science, is “unexpected and raises all kinds of new questions,” says University of Rochester biochemist Mark Dumont, a collaborator on the study.

“While there is no immediate medical relevance or application, the ideas that boil up from this could be very powerful,” Dumont says.

The study involved a series of experiments where Escherichia coli bacteria were infected with a virus that infects bacteria, or bacteriophage, called enterobacteria phage λ.

This phage latches onto the bacteria cell surface like a lunar module and injects its DNA into the cell to create copies of itself.

The E. coli fight back, using CRISPR to identify the threat by matching repetitive DNA sections from previously encountered phages, and then using an enzyme called Cas13b to snip the invading DNA into pieces.

A bacteriophage infecting a bacterium, hijacking the cell machinery to make copies of itself. (Guido4/Wikipedia)

The researchers found that the virus replicated sluggishly when Csx28 was present inside the bacteria.

This protein only worked in conjunction with Cas13b, which suggested the two were coordinating with each other to disarm the virus.

When both Cas13b and Csx28 were present, the proportion of infected bacteria that released infectious viral particles decreased from around 19 percent to roughly 3 percent, and there was a significant reduction of phage numbers per milliliter. In other words, the virus wasn’t able to replicate as much as it usually would.

Graph showing four experimental treatments.
The increase in the quantity of viruses was slowest when both Cas13b and Csx28 were present (light purple line). PFU stands for plaque-forming units and is a measure of viral load. (VanderWal et al.,Science, 2023)
The researchers examined the structure of the Csx28 protein using a technique called cryogenic electron microscopy and found that it resembled a funnel with a hole in the center.

This raised the possibility that the protein formed a membrane pore and was disrupting the metabolism of the cell to make it an inhospitable environment for the virus.

The researchers tested this hypothesis using a technique that makes cells fluorescent after they have lost their membrane potential, a small electrical charge caused by the difference in the concentration of ions inside and outside the cell.

They found that the two proteins together caused the membrane to depolarize, sending in a rush of charged atoms that radically altered the cell’s internal environment. After 90 minutes, 40 percent of the bacterial population was depolarized in this fashion.

“When you read this paper you think to yourself…’What?’ This is such a weird mechanism,” says University of Rochester molecular biologist John Lueck, who wasn’t involved in the research.

“It is really impressive that the team identified this pore-like protein that doesn’t resemble anything else we’ve seen before,” he says. “This is exciting because in science, when you scratch the surface, you often find that there is an entirely new world behind it.”

This paper was published in Science.



Source link

Previous Post

Postdoctoral Research Associate – IndiaBioscience

Next Post

The Quest for Longevity Is Already Over

Next Post

The Quest for Longevity Is Already Over

Recommended

Common Vaccinations Could Be One Way to Reduce The Risk of Developing Dementia : ScienceAlert

5 months ago

India’s Sacred Groves Are Resurrecting a Vanishing Forest

3 months ago

The NYPD’s Robot Dog Was a Really Bad Idea: Here’s What Went Wrong

2 months ago

Space Nerds at the Beach: A Dispatch From the Aerospace Games

9 months ago

This Lab-Grown Skin Could Revolutionize Transplants

4 months ago

Does a Smallpox Drug Work for Monkeypox? What Scientists Know

9 months ago
Life-Sciences-(-White-)

© Life Sciences News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • what’s new in science
  • Life Science
  • Contact

Newsletter Sign Up.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • what’s new in science
  • Life Science
  • Contact

© 2022 Life Sciences News Hubb All rights reserved.